Give it the project basics and the source documents. That is all it needs to start building.
A source-backed register is useful only if the team can review where each row came from. SubPro builds the first pass, keeps the evidence visible, and exports a register your team can inspect.
The register takes shape as rows your team can open, question, and clean up before handoff.
Give it the project basics and the source documents. That is all it needs to start building.
Draft rows are presented with enough structure for review, cleanup, scheduling, and export decisions.
A submittal register shapes early coordination. SubPro builds that starting point faster while keeping source context and review flags visible enough for accountable cleanup.
Every row comes from the specifications and carries its page, so a reviewer can trace the basis before the register moves on.
Anything that needs clarification or a PM's call gets flagged before the team treats the register as ready.
Once the team has inspected the rows, the register exports to a spreadsheet and moves into your downstream workflow.
Teams use register and log to mean nearly the same thing, and both usually point at the organized list of submittal obligations pulled from the specifications. When a team does draw a line, the register is the fuller source-backed list of everything the specs require, and the log is the working view used to track status day to day.
SubPro builds the source-backed register first, because that is the harder and riskier part. Once every obligation is captured with its evidence, tracking status on top of it is straightforward. Skip a requirement at the register stage and no amount of tracking will surface it.
The point of automating it is not speed for its own sake. It is keeping the basis visible. A register your team cannot trace is a register your team re-checks by hand, which defeats the purpose. SubPro keeps the source page behind every row so the register earns trust.
Take Section 05 12 00 Structural Steel, where an unsupported row invites an argument. SubPro keeps the evidence on each one.
A row for the structural steel shop drawings, carrying the 05 12 00 reference and the exact spec page behind it.
A row for required mill test certificates, source-linked so a reviewer can confirm the requirement in seconds.
Rows for welder qualifications and procedures, flagged where a decision or clarification is needed.
Every 05 12 00 row lands in the register with its evidence attached, so the team can defend it in coordination.
A tool reads the project specifications and builds the first-pass register, so the team reviews instead of transcribes. SubPro keeps the source evidence behind each row and hands off an editable file.
The terms overlap and many teams use them interchangeably. When distinguished, the register is the fuller source-backed list of every obligation pulled from the specs, and the log is the working view used to track status. SubPro builds the source-backed register first.
A register is only as trustworthy as the team's ability to check it. Keeping the source page behind each row means a reviewer can confirm why a requirement is listed and catch anything missing, instead of accepting a list on faith.
No. It is a reviewable starting point. The project team verifies scope, substitutions, responsible parties, dates, and final requirements before it moves into tracking.
The rest of the prep stage, from the first log pass to the handoff files.
How SubPro reduces the manual spec-to-log first pass.
Where SubPro fits before tracking and approval workflows start.
What files and review context the team receives.